5 messages2006-10-03 01:56 UTCthrough 2006-10-04 08:38
a sailing race question?
slickbutfoxbuger2006-10-03 01:56 UTC
hello to EveryOne.....
if I want to race my Cal-28, and at the same time, I also want to add
tank's and a chain locker in the keel. as well as changing the inside of the
main cabin, and possibly the cockpit too. will that dis-qualify the boat as
what it is/was in it's class. mind you, I have never raced before, and know
nothing about it. so, what can one change, and what can't one change? I
guess that mite be a better way of putting it.......
fiver,
Master of The "BB-54"
one of the famous Cal-28 flush-decks
out of Sierra-5, Papa Hotel (in days gone by)
now resting outside my shop
Federal Way, Wa.
(built like a Battleship; sails like a Sub......)
Re: [Cal_Boats] a sailing race question?
Michael Kennedy2006-10-03 02:18 UTC
With all that extra weight, the other boats will probably be happy to
see you. :)
Mike Kennedy
Conquest Cal 40 # 96
On Oct 2, 2006, at 6:56 PM, slickbutfoxbuger wrote:
>
> hello to EveryOne.....
>
> if I want to race my Cal-28, and at the same time, I also want
> to add tank's and a chain locker in the keel. as well as changing
> the inside of the main cabin, and possibly the cockpit too. will
> that dis-qualify the boat as what it is/was in it's class. mind
> you, I have never raced before, and know nothing about it. so, what
> can one change, and what can't one change? I guess that mite be a
> better way of putting it.......
>
>
> <F0F63949-9A87-475F-99EC-0D11177B8CA8>
>
> fiver,
> Master of The "BB-54"
> one of the famous Cal-28 flush-decks
> out of Sierra-5, Papa Hotel (in days gone by)
> now resting outside my shop
> Federal Way, Wa.
>
> (built like a Battleship; sails like a Sub......)
>
>
RE: [Cal_Boats] a sailing race question?
Scott Sauvageot2006-10-03 22:59 UTC
Hi,
As someone who started racing a Cal 25 about 3 years ago, I can tell you
that racing and cruising are totally different animals. For racing, you
want to keep the boat as light as possible. My 25 has few "cruising"
features beyond what is fleet required (stove, working sink head, basic
cushions). I've managed to cut the racing weight down quite handily, but
I've resigned myself to sparce living when cruising (It is, after all a Cal
25).
If you are considering one design racing the Cal 28 (not sure how many are
close to you to compete against) then modifications like changing the
interior or modifying the cockpit will disqualify you. In our fleet, I
could in theory modify my interior as long is I converted it to another
factory configuration for the Cal 25. If I removed all bunks and galley,
and decided to put in stringers for stiffness (basically making an empty
cavern for racing) then the boat would be tossed out in a heartbeat.
If you are planning to race the boat as a handicap PHRF entry, then the
modifications are allowed, you just have to declare them when you request a
rating.
Another serious option is to drain the water tanks and remove the cruising
anchor/chain rode when racing (you only need a lightweight hook when racing
to keep you from drifting away on those windless days). I even have
different batteries (use an outboard so starting an engine isn't an issue
for me) one is s standard 45lb deep cycle for cruising. I also have a 11lb
lawnmower battery that I use when racing. All it's for is to keep the
instruments and vhf running for the duration of the race. Also be sure to
have the head tank pumped and remove anything "cruising" related, but just
when racing. I typically have a stationwagon load or two (1973 Volvo with
the 6' long payload) filled with items I add for cruising or remove for
racing.
Hope this wasn't to convoluted. If you're seriously intersted in mostly
racing the boat, focus more on deck rigging, sails and "go faster"
improvements. If you make the cruising stuff lightweight or removable, then
you can have a good duel purpose boat.
Cheers,
Scott S.
Cal 25 #1651 Indefatigable
Annapolis, MD
>From: "slickbutfoxbuger" <Sl… [at] aol.com>
>Reply-To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
>To: <Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [Cal_Boats] a sailing race question?
>Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:56:27 -0700 (Pacific Standard Time)
>
>hello to EveryOne.....
>
>
>
> if I want to race my Cal-28, and at the same time, I also want to add
>tank's and a chain locker in the keel. as well as changing the inside of
>the
>main cabin, and possibly the cockpit too. will that dis-qualify the boat as
>what it is/was in it's class. mind you, I have never raced before, and know
>nothing about it. so, what can one change, and what can't one change? I
>guess that mite be a better way of putting it.......
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>fiver,
>
>Master of The "BB-54"
>
>one of the famous Cal-28 flush-decks
>
>out of Sierra-5, Papa Hotel (in days gone by)
>
>now resting outside my shop
>
>Federal Way, Wa.
>
>
>
>(built like a Battleship; sails like a Sub......)
><< faint_grain.jpg >>
><< 110104~2.GIF >>
Re: [Cal_Boats] a sailing race question?
Fin Beven2006-10-03 23:54 UTC
We had an interesting issue regarding displacement and Cal-40's here in SoCal. Hull #1 was something of a prototype, but was always treated as a Cal-40 by the class and by PHRF even though her displacement (approximately 14,800) was roughly 500 pounds lighter than the boats built just after her, and nearly 800 pounds lighter than the boats later in the production run. Several Cal-40s now weigh over 16,000, and a few weigh more than 17,000. It was "common knowledge" that #1 had 500 pounds less lead.
And then people started customizing. Almost all of the boats (except #1) now weigh more than the early stock boat, which had just a few winches, no radio or electronics, two small batteries, a small two-burner alcohol stove (without oven) and relatively small fuel and water tanks. The stern pulpit was an option, and none of the boats were launched with double life-lines. Of course no battery chargers, inverters, carpet, stereo, etc. etc.
We solved the problem in our local fleet by requiring a maximum floating height, combining the measurements at the bow and stern. Anything over that would indicate that the boat was too light. We use this number for our class championships. On Radiant, we have to top-off our fuel tank and leave the carpet in place to "make weight".
PHRF of SoCal was advised of this situation several times, but never came to terms with this weight difference, and still accepts 14,800 as a legitimate Cal-40 weight for Hull #1.
Fin Beven
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Sauvageot
To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 3:59 PM
Subject: RE: [Cal_Boats] a sailing race question?
Hi,
As someone who started racing a Cal 25 about 3 years ago, I can tell you
that racing and cruising are totally different animals. For racing, you
want to keep the boat as light as possible. My 25 has few "cruising"
features beyond what is fleet required (stove, working sink head, basic
cushions). I've managed to cut the racing weight down quite handily, but
I've resigned myself to sparce living when cruising (It is, after all a Cal
25).
If you are considering one design racing the Cal 28 (not sure how many are
close to you to compete against) then modifications like changing the
interior or modifying the cockpit will disqualify you. In our fleet, I
could in theory modify my interior as long is I converted it to another
factory configuration for the Cal 25. If I removed all bunks and galley,
and decided to put in stringers for stiffness (basically making an empty
cavern for racing) then the boat would be tossed out in a heartbeat.
If you are planning to race the boat as a handicap PHRF entry, then the
modifications are allowed, you just have to declare them when you request a
rating.
Another serious option is to drain the water tanks and remove the cruising
anchor/chain rode when racing (you only need a lightweight hook when racing
to keep you from drifting away on those windless days). I even have
different batteries (use an outboard so starting an engine isn't an issue
for me) one is s standard 45lb deep cycle for cruising. I also have a 11lb
lawnmower battery that I use when racing. All it's for is to keep the
instruments and vhf running for the duration of the race. Also be sure to
have the head tank pumped and remove anything "cruising" related, but just
when racing. I typically have a stationwagon load or two (1973 Volvo with
the 6' long payload) filled with items I add for cruising or remove for
racing.
Hope this wasn't to convoluted. If you're seriously intersted in mostly
racing the boat, focus more on deck rigging, sails and "go faster"
improvements. If you make the cruising stuff lightweight or removable, then
you can have a good duel purpose boat.
Cheers,
Scott S.
Cal 25 #1651 Indefatigable
Annapolis, MD
>From: "slickbutfoxbuger" <Sl… [at] aol.com>
>Reply-To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
>To: <Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [Cal_Boats] a sailing race question?
>Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:56:27 -0700 (Pacific Standard Time)
>
>hello to EveryOne.....
>
>
>
> if I want to race my Cal-28, and at the same time, I also want to add
>tank's and a chain locker in the keel. as well as changing the inside of
>the
>main cabin, and possibly the cockpit too. will that dis-qualify the boat as
>what it is/was in it's class. mind you, I have never raced before, and know
>nothing about it. so, what can one change, and what can't one change? I
>guess that mite be a better way of putting it.......
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>fiver,
>
>Master of The "BB-54"
>
>one of the famous Cal-28 flush-decks
>
>out of Sierra-5, Papa Hotel (in days gone by)
>
>now resting outside my shop
>
>Federal Way, Wa.
>
>
>
>(built like a Battleship; sails like a Sub......)
><< faint_grain.jpg >>
><< 110104~2.GIF >>
Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: a sailing race question?
slickbutfoxbuger2006-10-04 08:38
no, You were not convoluted at all;
it was very easy for me to follow your logic, and whats more;
it was exactly what i wanted to know.
i have always felt that the only skookum way to build or re-
build a sailboat was with top-quality deck gear, and lightweight
materials (as much as possible). to be honest, i have been collecting
some of the gear for several years now. i have a complete suite of
lumare racing series 60mm high-load alloy blocks. i bought them right
when lumare introduced the line, and was selling them at around $13 a
shive. two months back, the local westmarine was closing out their
stock of New England Ropes Endura-12. they had about 1/2 a spool of
5/16" @ a little over 50 cents a foot. so i got the whole spool.
before that, i had figured to use wire halyards as old bronze wire
wenches are cheap in the seattle area, and that was the best i could
do. but stuff comes to those who wait, and watch. wire would have
been good, if not a bit old-school, but this is much better.
before the boat sees that water again, she will have all new
standing and running rigging (except for a suite of sails). all new
wiring, lighting and nav-lights. a split electrical buss, and a full
suite of the best personally rebuilt hand-picked Raytheon
electronics. and it is plained that she will have a *forward mounted*
Kubota diesel as well. the deck will boast a full set a Bowmar low-
profile cast aluminum frame hatch's with lexon lights. and it is my
hope to have located by that time; replacement cast SS rectangular
opening side ports for the boat.
but some of the finer points such as the steering gear, i have
been rethinking as of late. my first choice was a worm-gear for
strength and zero feed-back. but listening to the talk around here
about needing to feel the helm's *weather*. and doing some other
reading, i am beginning to wonder about my choice. i do want a fully
mechanical system for reliability. so hydraulic is out. so it is
really just a matter of if i want the feed-back or not.
now as to the extra weight;
i am not really going to add weight so much as move it
around. the stuff that is built into the boats at the factory is done
to save money at time of construction. and to use standardized parts
as much as possible. no one could afford the boat if it was all just
the prefect configuration. i on the other hand, am under no such
restraint. and as you have shown me already; what i am planing will
disqualify the boat under the one-class rules anyway. also, it's
really nice living near a place like Boeing. this as one can find
many light-weight building materials in their surplus yard for little
or nothing. and watching aircraft construction can give one a lot of
good ideas on how to save weight on boats. with the Cal-28, weight is
not exactly a bad thing to a point. it's where one puts the weight
that can make it good, or bad. at lest that is what my calculations
have suggested to me. but they were rough at best.
i do Thank You for Your response; it was most enlightening....
fiver,
Master of The "BB-54"
one of the famous Cal-28 flush-decks
out of Sierra-5, Papa Hotel (in days gone by)
now resting outside my shop
Federal Way, Wa.
(built like a Battleship; sails like a Sub......)
**********************
--- In Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com, "Scott Sauvageot"
<rxnumbercruncher@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As someone who started racing a Cal 25 about 3 years ago, I can
tell you
> that racing and cruising are totally different animals. For
racing, you
> want to keep the boat as light as possible. My 25 has
few "cruising"
> features beyond what is fleet required (stove, working sink head,
basic
> cushions). I've managed to cut the racing weight down quite
handily, but
> I've resigned myself to sparce living when cruising (It is, after
all a Cal
> 25).
>
> If you are considering one design racing the Cal 28 (not sure how
many are
> close to you to compete against) then modifications like changing
the
> interior or modifying the cockpit will disqualify you. In our
fleet, I
> could in theory modify my interior as long is I converted it to
another
> factory configuration for the Cal 25. If I removed all bunks and
galley,
> and decided to put in stringers for stiffness (basically making an
empty
> cavern for racing) then the boat would be tossed out in a heartbeat.
>
> If you are planning to race the boat as a handicap PHRF entry, then
the
> modifications are allowed, you just have to declare them when you
request a
> rating.
>
> Another serious option is to drain the water tanks and remove the
cruising
> anchor/chain rode when racing (you only need a lightweight hook
when racing
> to keep you from drifting away on those windless days). I even
have
> different batteries (use an outboard so starting an engine isn't an
issue
> for me) one is s standard 45lb deep cycle for cruising. I also
have a 11lb
> lawnmower battery that I use when racing. All it's for is to keep
the
> instruments and vhf running for the duration of the race. Also be
sure to
> have the head tank pumped and remove anything "cruising" related,
but just
> when racing. I typically have a stationwagon load or two (1973
Volvo with
> the 6' long payload) filled with items I add for cruising or remove
for
> racing.
>
> Hope this wasn't to convoluted. If you're seriously intersted in
mostly
> racing the boat, focus more on deck rigging, sails and "go faster"
> improvements. If you make the cruising stuff lightweight or
removable, then
> you can have a good duel purpose boat.
>
> Cheers,
> Scott S.
> Cal 25 #1651 Indefatigable
> Annapolis, MD
>
>