11 messages2006-10-05 14:40 UTCthrough 2006-12-05 15:14 UTC
The Pox
Chris Campbell2006-10-05 14:40 UTC
Listees:
I went out to the Cal 20 last night to get my license off the trailer,
and to inspect the pimples again.
First of all, these are not the classic blisters that I've seen in
articles and around boatyards. Those are usually the size of a quarter
or larger, and under the waterline. I have not seen any of those on
this hull.
My pimples are appearing primarily at or above the boot-top stripe, and
they are mostly about 1/8" diameter (but numerous).
The Cal 20 has a boot-top stripe molded in, of gelcoat. The pimples are
mostly in or above it, extending up maybe 3 or 4 inches vertically.
There is one place where I think I see some under the antifouling paint
(under the waterline), but it's just a small area.
Somebody raised the issue of osmosis _from inside_. That's a
possibility, although the interior of the boat is mostly dry. I
occasionally get a bit of condensation below the waterline when moist
air hits the interior surface that is cooled by immersion, but that
would not explain pimples forming above the waterline. Can you get
osmotic blistering from the inside just by means of humid air?
As noted previously, it seems odd that this boat survived 30 years in
fresh water with no apparent effect, and then started getting pimples.
It's way past adolescence.
The practical answer is probably "hell, Campbell, don't worry about it,
you'll be dead and gone before the boat falls apart." But I don't like
the use-it-up-and-throw-it-away culture, and it would be nice to pass on
a sound hull to some new sailor when I can't sail any more (30 years
from now). So I do worry about it, and remain curious about what's
going on.
Does anybody have ideas?
Chris Campbell
Cal 20 #1220, "Martha C"
Re: [Cal_Boats] The Pox
Chris Campbell2006-10-12 21:38 UTC
Bruce Stirling wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> In my web cruising I stumbled across an article written by someone who
> experienced the same problem. The article had pictures of the tiny
> pimples. They covered the whole hull.
Bruce:
This brings to mind to old saying "ignorance is bliss." I'm trying hard
to ignore the whole subject right now, since the pox are occurring where
they shouldn't be and can't be if it's osmosis. If they shouldn't be
there and can't be there, they aren't, and that's that.
Chris
RE: [Cal_Boats] The Pox
Frank and Wendy2006-11-01 02:21 UTC
Hello fellow sufferers of the POX,
I had the same problem on my 31, but it is fixed.
I bought the boat last year and noticed what I thought at first to me just a
dimpled/stippled bottom paint. Closer examination when the boat was hauled
showed that the pox were actually in the gelcoat. This was a localized
problem- some on the bow and some close to the stern, mostly below the
waterline but also up into the bootstripe. These where much smaller than any
'blisters' I had seen on other boats. I opened some up but there was just
more jelcoat inside-no water/glycol or voids. I also have some on the
interior gelcoat where there has never been water contact.
Anyhow, since the bottom paint was of an unknown variety I sanded it all off
going just deep enough to remove the POX also. I then painted it with 5
coats of interlux Interprotect epoxy barrier coat, then VC-17 bottom paint .
The bottom looks as good as it did in the spring now that the boat is hauled
and washed.
i think that these small POX are just some flaw in the gellcoat chemistry
used at the time of manufacture, and not truly a form of osmotic blistering.
I had several people look at the boat before I did the work and no one had
seen this kind of "blister". I had considered having the boat peeled or
sandblasted last year but opted for the cheap do-it -yourself solution. All
told it probably cost $400 in materials and about 30hrs of my labor.
Re: [Cal_Boats] The Pox
Chris Campbell2006-11-01 14:27 UTC
Frank and Wendy wrote:
>
> Hello fellow sufferers of the POX,
> I had the same problem on my 31, but it is fixed.
> I bought the boat last year and noticed what I thought at first to me
> just a dimpled/stippled bottom paint.
This sounds like what I have on the Cal 20, except mine is _above_ the
waterline.
> Closer examination when the boat was hauled showed that the pox were
> actually in the gelcoat. This was a localized problem- some on the bow
> and some close to the stern, mostly below the waterline but also up
> into the bootstripe.
That's where mine start.
> These where much smaller than any 'blisters' I had seen on other
> boats. I opened some up but there was just more jelcoat inside-no
> water/glycol or voids. I also have some on the interior gelcoat where
> there has never been water contact.
This is all good news.
> Anyhow, since the bottom paint was of an unknown variety I sanded it
> all off going just deep enough to remove the POX also. I then painted
> it with 5 coats of interlux Interprotect epoxy barrier coat, then
> VC-17 bottom paint .
This part sounds like work. I was hoping for an easy fix...like waving
a magic wand. But it's worthy of note that _Practical Sailo_r's
latest issue has a review of some more bottom-paint removers that worked
very well.
>
> i think that these small POX are just some flaw in the gellcoat
> chemistry used at the time of manufacture, and not truly a form of
> osmotic blistering.
Good! Thanks for the report.
Chris Campbell
Cal 20 #1220
Barrier Coats - was POX
Husar Charlie2006-11-02 22:16 UTC
I've known people who have done barrier coats stuff (e.g., Interlux)
with post sanding and smoothing, and then said that bottom paint did not
stick to it. Any special treatment required?
The web nazis should note my proper implementation of the change in
title to promote proper archiving.
:~]
Cheers
Charlie
From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Chris Campbell
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:27 AM
To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Cal_Boats] The Pox
Frank and Wendy wrote:
Hello fellow sufferers of the POX,
I had the same problem on my 31, but it is fixed.
I bought the boat last year and noticed what I thought at first
to me just a dimpled/stippled bottom paint.
This sounds like what I have on the Cal 20, except mine is above the
waterline.
Closer examination when the boat was hauled showed that the pox
were actually in the gelcoat. This was a localized problem- some on the
bow and some close to the stern, mostly below the waterline but also up
into the bootstripe.
That's where mine start.
These where much smaller than any 'blisters' I had seen on other
boats. I opened some up but there was just more jelcoat inside-no
water/glycol or voids. I also have some on the interior gelcoat where
there has never been water contact.
This is all good news.
Anyhow, since the bottom paint was of an unknown variety I
sanded it all off going just deep enough to remove the POX also. I then
painted it with 5 coats of interlux Interprotect epoxy barrier coat,
then VC-17 bottom paint .
This part sounds like work. I was hoping for an easy fix...like waving
a magic wand. But it's worthy of note that Practical Sailor's
latest issue has a review of some more bottom-paint removers that worked
very well.
i think that these small POX are just some flaw in the gellcoat
chemistry used at the time of manufacture, and not truly a form of
osmotic blistering.
Good! Thanks for the report.
Chris Campbell
Cal 20 #1220
Re: [Cal_Boats] Barrier Coats - was POX
Scott Sauvageot2006-11-02 22:31 UTC
The trick with Interprotect 2000 is to apply the first coat of bottom paint while the interprotect is still alittle tacky. This creates a better bond of bottom paint to interprotect.
You can also sand the interprotect and use a solvent wash to thoroughly clean and prep the surface. Don't sand it too smooth, otherwise the paint won't adhere.
Cheers,
Scott
----- Original Message -----
From: Husar Charlie
To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 2:16 PM
Subject: [Cal_Boats] Barrier Coats - was POX
I've known people who have done barrier coats stuff (e.g., Interlux) with post sanding and smoothing, and then said that bottom paint did not stick to it. Any special treatment required?
The web nazis should note my proper implementation of the change in title to promote proper archiving.
:~]
Cheers
Charlie
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Campbell
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:27 AM
To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Cal_Boats] The Pox
Frank and Wendy wrote:
Hello fellow sufferers of the POX,
I had the same problem on my 31, but it is fixed.
I bought the boat last year and noticed what I thought at first to me just a dimpled/stippled bottom paint.
This sounds like what I have on the Cal 20, except mine is above the waterline.
Closer examination when the boat was hauled showed that the pox were actually in the gelcoat. This was a localized problem- some on the bow and some close to the stern, mostly below the waterline but also up into the bootstripe.
That's where mine start.
These where much smaller than any 'blisters' I had seen on other boats. I opened some up but there was just more jelcoat inside-no water/glycol or voids. I also have some on the interior gelcoat where there has never been water contact.
This is all good news.
Anyhow, since the bottom paint was of an unknown variety I sanded it all off going just deep enough to remove the POX also. I then painted it with 5 coats of interlux Interprotect epoxy barrier coat, then VC-17 bottom paint .
This part sounds like work. I was hoping for an easy fix...like waving a magic wand. But it's worthy of note that Practical Sailor's
latest issue has a review of some more bottom-paint removers that worked very well.
i think that these small POX are just some flaw in the gellcoat chemistry used at the time of manufacture, and not truly a form of osmotic blistering.
Good! Thanks for the report.
Chris Campbell
Cal 20 #1220
RE: [Cal_Boats] Barrier Coats - was POX
Robert Andrew2006-11-02 22:52 UTC
The application requirements for bottom paint over the interprotect are very
precise - depending on when the job was done (ie what vintage of
interprotect was used) there isn't a very long time window between
application of the barrier coat and application of the first coat of bottom
paint. You have to read the directions VERY carefully.
Bob Andrew
From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Husar Charlie
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:16 PM
To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Cal_Boats] Barrier Coats - was POX
I've known people who have done barrier coats stuff (e.g., Interlux) with
post sanding and smoothing, and then said that bottom paint did not stick to
it. Any special treatment required?
The web nazis should note my proper implementation of the change in title to
promote proper archiving.
:~]
Cheers
Charlie
_____
From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Chris Campbell
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:27 AM
To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Cal_Boats] The Pox
Frank and Wendy wrote:
Hello fellow sufferers of the POX,
I had the same problem on my 31, but it is fixed.
I bought the boat last year and noticed what I thought at first to me just a
dimpled/stippled bottom paint.
This sounds like what I have on the Cal 20, except mine is above the
waterline.
Closer examination when the boat was hauled showed that the pox were
actually in the gelcoat. This was a localized problem- some on the bow and
some close to the stern, mostly below the waterline but also up into the
bootstripe.
That's where mine start.
These where much smaller than any 'blisters' I had seen on other boats. I
opened some up but there was just more jelcoat inside-no water/glycol or
voids. I also have some on the interior gelcoat where there has never been
water contact.
This is all good news.
Anyhow, since the bottom paint was of an unknown variety I sanded it all off
going just deep enough to remove the POX also. I then painted it with 5
coats of interlux Interprotect epoxy barrier coat, then VC-17 bottom paint .
This part sounds like work. I was hoping for an easy fix...like waving a
magic wand. But it's worthy of note that Practical Sailor's
latest issue has a review of some more bottom-paint removers that worked
very well.
i think that these small POX are just some flaw in the gellcoat chemistry
used at the time of manufacture, and not truly a form of osmotic blistering.
Good! Thanks for the report.
Chris Campbell
Cal 20 #1220
RE: [Cal_Boats] Barrier Coats - was POX
Frank and Wendy2006-11-03 01:23 UTC
Charlie,
I can agree with that. I have done quite a bit of fairing and epoxy work on
my boats. Fairing keels, built 3 epoxy/carbon rudders, etc. The problem is
if you want a really good racing bottom you have to let interprotect dry
completely so you can wet sand it. In this case the VC-17 adheres poorly.
Looks good at irst but will be gone after a few in water cleanings.
Another technique is to get the interprotect on as smooth as possible and
then put the bottom paint on before the interprotect is fully cured---this
is what interlux recommends (what I did). I have found that Petit SR21
sticks to smooth interprotect better than VC17(interlux).
Since I am pathologically fixated on a smooth bottom (on the boat) I plan to
re-sand the bottom in the winter/spring while I improve the keel to a NACA
profile. I plan to try one of the harder anti-fouls like VC offshore and
then go over that with VC-17 as the final ablative coating for my Lake Erie
sailing.
The bad part is I won't be able to blame the boat when I loose. I can still
blame the PHRF rating I guess.
At least the POX are gone.
Charlie,
I had some POX above the waterline too, even some inside the boat on
gellcoated surfaces (in hanging locker). On the top-sides it would'nt that
bad of a job to sand her down if you don't mind painting the boat after.
Nothin like a fresh paint job! I did the entire boat last year from rub-rail
to keel. Removed all the nics and gouges from the previous owner and now she
looks like new.
Frank
Cal31 Footloose
-----Original Message-----
From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of Husar Charlie
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:16 PM
To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Cal_Boats] Barrier Coats - was POX
I've known people who have done barrier coats stuff (e.g., Interlux) with
post sanding and smoothing, and then said that bottom paint did not stick to
it. Any special treatment required?
The web nazis should note my proper implementation of the change in title
to promote proper archiving.
:~]
Cheers
Charlie
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Chris Campbell
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:27 AM
To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Cal_Boats] The Pox
Frank and Wendy wrote:
Hello fellow sufferers of the POX,
I had the same problem on my 31, but it is fixed.
I bought the boat last year and noticed what I thought at first to me
just a dimpled/stippled bottom paint.
This sounds like what I have on the Cal 20, except mine is above the
waterline.
Closer examination when the boat was hauled showed that the pox were
actually in the gelcoat. This was a localized problem- some on the bow and
some close to the stern, mostly below the waterline but also up into the
bootstripe.
That's where mine start.
These where much smaller than any 'blisters' I had seen on other boats.
I opened some up but there was just more jelcoat inside-no water/glycol or
voids. I also have some on the interior gelcoat where there has never been
water contact.
This is all good news.
Anyhow, since the bottom paint was of an unknown variety I sanded it all
off going just deep enough to remove the POX also. I then painted it with 5
coats of interlux Interprotect epoxy barrier coat, then VC-17 bottom paint .
This part sounds like work. I was hoping for an easy fix...like waving a
magic wand. But it's worthy of note that Practical Sailor's
latest issue has a review of some more bottom-paint removers that worked
very well.
i think that these small POX are just some flaw in the gellcoat
chemistry used at the time of manufacture, and not truly a form of osmotic
blistering.
Good! Thanks for the report.
Chris Campbell
Cal 20 #1220
Boot Stripe...was Barrier Coats - was POX
jo… [at] peco-energy.com2006-11-03 21:07 UTC
Charlie:
Was it you who posted something recently about painting a boot stripe?
If so, would you please run through the drill again, as I'm looking to do mine in the spring.
Thanks.
Jon Myers
Cal 3-29 Bay Breeze ballast
From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Husar Charlie
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:16 PM
To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Cal_Boats] Barrier Coats - was POX
I've known people who have done barrier coats stuff (e.g., Interlux) with post sanding and smoothing, and then said that bottom paint did not stick to it. Any special treatment required?
The web nazis should note my proper implementation of the change in title to promote proper archiving.
:~]
Cheers
Charlie
_____
From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Campbell
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:27 AM
To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Cal_Boats] The Pox
Frank and Wendy wrote:
Hello fellow sufferers of the POX,
I had the same problem on my 31, but it is fixed.
I bought the boat last year and noticed what I thought at first to me just a dimpled/stippled bottom paint.
This sounds like what I have on the Cal 20, except mine is above the waterline.
Closer examination when the boat was hauled showed that the pox were actually in the gelcoat. This was a localized problem- some on the bow and some close to the stern, mostly below the waterline but also up into the bootstripe.
That's where mine start.
These where much smaller than any 'blisters' I had seen on other boats. I opened some up but there was just more jelcoat inside-no water/glycol or voids. I also have some on the interior gelcoat where there has never been water contact.
This is all good news.
Anyhow, since the bottom paint was of an unknown variety I sanded it all off going just deep enough to remove the POX also. I then painted it with 5 coats of interlux Interprotect epoxy barrier coat, then VC-17 bottom paint .
This part sounds like work. I was hoping for an easy fix...like waving a magic wand. But it's worthy of note that Practical Sailor's
latest issue has a review of some more bottom-paint removers that worked very well.
i think that these small POX are just some flaw in the gellcoat chemistry used at the time of manufacture, and not truly a form of osmotic blistering.
Good! Thanks for the report.
Chris Campbell
Cal 20 #1220
-----------------------------------------
**************************************************
This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon
Corporation proprietary information, which is privileged,
confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to the Exelon
Corporation family of Companies.
This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation
to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail
in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently
delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout.
Thank You.
**************************************************
Re: [Cal_Boats] Boot Stripe...was Barrier Coats - was POX
Terrence Spencer2006-11-03 22:48 UTC
I did mine recently with Brightside, the paint Interlux recommends for that
purpose. It easily passes the 6 & 6 test, ie 6 feet away at 6 knots. It
looks pretty good up close too. Get the packet of Interlux materials sent
to you. I found it really helpful. The tiny squares of paint samples look
brighter in bigger swatches and in natural light however.
Good luck,
Terry Spencer
Cal 2-29
Capriccio
From: <jo… [at] peco-energy.com>
Reply-To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 16:07:24 -0500
To: <Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Cal_Boats] Boot Stripe...was Barrier Coats - was POX
Charlie:
Was it you who posted something recently about painting a boot stripe?
If so, would you please run through the drill again, as I'm looking to
do mine in the spring.
Thanks.
Jon Myers
Cal 3-29 Bay Breeze ballast
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com]On Behalf
> Of Husar Charlie
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:16 PM
> To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Cal_Boats] Barrier Coats - was POX
>
>
>
>
>
> I've known people who have done barrier coats stuff (e.g., Interlux) with
> post sanding and smoothing, and then said that bottom paint did not stick to
> it. Any special treatment required?
>
>
>
> The web nazis should note my proper implementation of the change in title to
> promote proper archiving.
>
>
>
:~]
Cheers
Charlie
From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Chris Campbell
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:27 AM
To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Cal_Boats] The Pox
Frank and Wendy wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hello fellow sufferers of the POX,
>
> I had the same problem on my 31, but it is fixed.
>
> I bought the boat last year and noticed what I thought at first to me just a
> dimpled/stippled bottom paint.
>
>
This sounds like what I have on the Cal 20, except mine is above the
waterline.
>
>
>
>
> Closer examination when the boat was hauled showed that the pox were actually
> in the gelcoat. This was a localized problem- some on the bow and some close
> to the stern, mostly below the waterline but also up into the bootstripe.
That's where mine start.
>
>
>
>
> These where much smaller than any 'blisters' I had seen on other boats. I
> opened some up but there was just more jelcoat inside-no water/glycol or
> voids. I also have some on the interior gelcoat where there has never been
> water contact.
This is all good news.
>
>
>
>
> Anyhow, since the bottom paint was of an unknown variety I sanded it all off
> going just deep enough to remove the POX also. I then painted it with 5 coats
> of interlux Interprotect epoxy barrier coat, then VC-17 bottom paint .
This part sounds like work. I was hoping for an easy fix...like waving a
magic wand. But it's worthy of note that Practical Sailor's
latest issue has a review of some more bottom-paint removers that worked
very well.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> i think that these small POX are just some flaw in the gellcoat chemistry
> used at the time of manufacture, and not truly a form of osmotic blistering.
Good! Thanks for the report.
Chris Campbell
Cal 20 #1220
**************************************************
This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon
Corporation proprietary information, which is privileged,
confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to the Exelon
Corporation family of Companies.
This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation
to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail
in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently
delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout.
Thank You.
**************************************************
>
RE: [Cal_Boats] The Pox
Bruce Stirling2006-12-05 15:14 UTC
Chris,
In my web cruising I stumbled across an article written by someone who
experienced the same problem. The article had pictures of the tiny pimples.
They covered the whole hull. I can't remember where I read it, and don't
have time right now to search again, but I believe it was a Beneteau owner's
cruising site. If I recall, they had the repairs done in New Zealand.
Maybe, with the right Google search terms, you can locate the article. If I
recall, there was some shortcut taken in the manufacturing process that
Beneteau made good one. I think it was Beneteau . . . . I think they had
to remove the entire gel coat and redo. Even then, it reappeared by their
next port-of-call, but not as bad as original. Think they had to do it
twice to correct problem.
Happy googling!
Bruce Stirling
From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com]On Behalf
Of Chris Campbell
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:41 AM
To: cal; Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Cal_Boats] The Pox
Listees:
I went out to the Cal 20 last night to get my license off the trailer, and
to inspect the pimples again.
First of all, these are not the classic blisters that I've seen in articles
and around boatyards. Those are usually the size of a quarter or larger,
and under the waterline. I have not seen any of those on this hull.
My pimples are appearing primarily at or above the boot-top stripe, and they
are mostly about 1/8" diameter (but numerous).
The Cal 20 has a boot-top stripe molded in, of gelcoat. The pimples are
mostly in or above it, extending up maybe 3 or 4 inches vertically. There
is one place where I think I see some under the antifouling paint (under the
waterline), but it's just a small area.
Somebody raised the issue of osmosis from inside. That's a possibility,
although the interior of the boat is mostly dry. I occasionally get a bit
of condensation below the waterline when moist air hits the interior surface
that is cooled by immersion, but that would not explain pimples forming
above the waterline. Can you get osmotic blistering from the inside just by
means of humid air?
As noted previously, it seems odd that this boat survived 30 years in fresh
water with no apparent effect, and then started getting pimples. It's way
past adolescence.
The practical answer is probably "hell, Campbell, don't worry about it,
you'll be dead and gone before the boat falls apart." But I don't like the
use-it-up-and-throw-it-away culture, and it would be nice to pass on a sound
hull to some new sailor when I can't sail any more (30 years from now). So
I do worry about it, and remain curious about what's going on.
Does anybody have ideas?
Chris Campbell
Cal 20 #1220, "Martha C"