FW: Cal 33 & 35

From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sailoeman2 Sent: October 12, 2007 3:29 PM To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Cal 33 & 35 Hello, I am new to the Cal boats yahoo group. I oown a 1985 Cal 35 MK II. In answer to questions it is a Lapworth design. In communicating with others in another Cal group no longer functioning I was told that my hull number indicated that my Cal 35 was the last 35 produced by Cal Boats. I do know it was the last one produced in Florida before Cal moved everything back to Fall River, Mass. I did not think they ever produced the 35 again before going out of business, but I saw a 1988 Cal 35 advertised in the Boat US magazine. Does anyone know where or if I can find a replacement engine panel insert, not the engine panel itself, but the white plastic insert that is atached to the cockpit fiberglass and the engine panel fits into the insert? --- In Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com, r good <my1972ih@...> wrote: > > > unless you are on the tall side, in which case go for the Cruising Cal 35 with 6'6" headroom > Reggie > > > To: Cal_Boats@...: imissedmyface@...: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:36:11 - 0700Subject: Re: [Cal_Boats] Cal 33 & 35 > > > > > > > Scott, > > When you refer to the `Cal 35', I assume you are referring to 80's Mk I and II models (Lapworth, IORish) because they look somewhat like the 33 (Hunt). > > In my opinion, the 33 is a much better performing boat with a more modern design. It also is available in a 4.67' draft model which I believe is what you need for the Chesapeake and other shallow bays on the east coast. So that would be my choice if coastal cruising is a priority. > > If offshore cruising is a priority, I'd lean towards a deep draft boat unless the Bahamas' are a priority. For the cost of a 33 (which are a bit more expensive than the 35), you might be getting into Cal 39 territory and I really like them for offshore work. So I'd recommend the jump to the 39 for offshore work. > > If for some reason the 35 is still on your list, get the Mk II. > > Dave > 80 Cal 35 MkI, Runnin Late > Coyote Pt, SF Bay > > > ----- Original Message ----From: Scott Sauvageot <rxnumbercruncher@...>To: cal_boats@...: Thursday, October 11, 2007 12:54:37 PMSubject: [Cal_Boats] Cal 33 & 35 > > Windows Live Hotmail and Microsoft Office Outlook - together at last. Get it now! > > > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. >

I had a similar problem with my Cal 3-30. I took the old plastic panel to a local car customizer who built a stainless steel replacement panel using the old plastic panel as a pattern. Looks and works great. Nick <Ni… [at] shaw.ca> wrote: -----Original Message----- From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sailoeman2 Sent: October 12, 2007 3:29 PM To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Cal 33 & 35 Hello, I am new to the Cal boats yahoo group. I oown a 1985 Cal 35 MK II. In answer to questions it is a Lapworth design. In communicating with others in another Cal group no longer functioning I was told that my hull number indicated that my Cal 35 was the last 35 produced by Cal Boats. I do know it was the last one produced in Florida before Cal moved everything back to Fall River, Mass. I did not think they ever produced the 35 again before going out of business, but I saw a 1988 Cal 35 advertised in the Boat US magazine. Does anyone know where or if I can find a replacement engine panel insert, not the engine panel itself, but the white plastic insert that is atached to the cockpit fiberglass and the engine panel fits into the insert? --- In Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com, r good <my1972ih@...> wrote: > > > unless you are on the tall side, in which case go for the Cruising Cal 35 with 6'6" headroom > Reggie > > > To: Cal_Boats@...: imissedmyface@...: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:36:11 - 0700Subject: Re: [Cal_Boats] Cal 33 & 35 > > > > > > > Scott, > > When you refer to the `Cal 35', I assume you are referring to 80's Mk I and II models (Lapworth, IORish) because they look somewhat like the 33 (Hunt). > > In my opinion, the 33 is a much better performing boat with a more modern design. It also is available in a 4.67' draft model which I believe is what you need for the Chesapeake and other shallow bays on the east coast. So that would be my choice if coastal cruising is a priority. > > If offshore cruising is a priority, I'd lean towards a deep draft boat unless the Bahamas' are a priority. For the cost of a 33 (which are a bit more expensive than the 35), you might be getting into Cal 39 territory and I really like them for offshore work. So I'd recommend the jump to the 39 for offshore work. > > If for some reason the 35 is still on your list, get the Mk II. > > Dave > 80 Cal 35 MkI, Runnin Late > Coyote Pt, SF Bay > > > ----- Original Message ----From: Scott Sauvageot <rxnumbercruncher@...>To: cal_boats@...: Thursday, October 11, 2007 12:54:37 PMSubject: [Cal_Boats] Cal 33 & 35 > > Windows Live Hotmail and Microsoft Office Outlook - together at last. Get it now! > > > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. > --------------------------------- Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.

Try www.wewireboats.com He is a sailor who also owns a Cal and makes custom electrical panels for boats. Met him online through Cal group and met him in Annapolis a couple of years ago. Actually, he is going to give me a price on one over the winter as I am also in need of a new panel. Good Luck Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: Preferred Customer To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 11:54 AM Subject: Replacement instrument panel was Re: [Cal_Boats] FW: Cal 33 & 35 I had a similar problem with my Cal 3-30. I took the old plastic panel to a local car customizer who built a stainless steel replacement panel using the old plastic panel as a pattern. Looks and works great. Nick <Ni… [at] shaw.ca> wrote: -----Original Message----- From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sailoeman2 Sent: October 12, 2007 3:29 PM To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Cal 33 & 35 Hello, I am new to the Cal boats yahoo group. I oown a 1985 Cal 35 MK II. In answer to questions it is a Lapworth design. In communicating with others in another Cal group no longer functioning I was told that my hull number indicated that my Cal 35 was the last 35 produced by Cal Boats. I do know it was the last one produced in Florida before Cal moved everything back to Fall River, Mass. I did not think they ever produced the 35 again before going out of business, but I saw a 1988 Cal 35 advertised in the Boat US magazine. Does anyone know where or if I can find a replacement engine panel insert, not the engine panel itself, but the white plastic insert that is atached to the cockpit fiberglass and the engine panel fits into the insert? --- In Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com, r good <my1972ih@...> wrote: > > > unless you are on the tall side, in which case go for the Cruising Cal 35 with 6'6" headroom > Reggie > > > To: Cal_Boats@...: imissedmyface@...: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:36:11 - 0700Subject: Re: [Cal_Boats] Cal 33 & 35 > > > > > > > Scott, > > When you refer to the `Cal 35', I assume you are referring to 80's Mk I and II models (Lapworth, IORish) because they look somewhat like the 33 (Hunt). > > In my opinion, the 33 is a much better performing boat with a more modern design. It also is available in a 4.67' draft model which I believe is what you need for the Chesapeake and other shallow bays on the east coast. So that would be my choice if coastal cruising is a priority. > > If offshore cruising is a priority, I'd lean towards a deep draft boat unless the Bahamas' are a priority. For the cost of a 33 (which are a bit more expensive than the 35), you might be getting into Cal 39 territory and I really like them for offshore work. So I'd recommend the jump to the 39 for offshore work. > > If for some reason the 35 is still on your list, get the Mk II. > > Dave > 80 Cal 35 MkI, Runnin Late > Coyote Pt, SF Bay > > > ----- Original Message ----From: Scott Sauvageot <rxnumbercruncher@...>To: cal_boats@...: Thursday, October 11, 2007 12:54:37 PMSubject: [Cal_Boats] Cal 33 & 35 > > Windows Live Hotmail and Microsoft Office Outlook - together at last. Get it now! > > > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.

Looking for a panel ? I can make you one in stainless steel ! I made one and you can see it on my web page . www.freedomfabrications.com <http://www.freedomfabrications.com> Check out my photos page. Any thing for your boat in stainless steel , railing , davit , mount for windmill gen. Take a look JR --- In Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com, Sail Away <Svadas4@...> wrote: > > Try www.wewireboats.com > > He is a sailor who also owns a Cal and makes custom electrical panels for boats. Met him online through Cal group and met him in Annapolis a couple of years ago. Actually, he is going to give me a price on one over the winter as I am also in need of a new panel. > > Good Luck > Greg > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Preferred Customer > To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 11:54 AM > Subject: Replacement instrument panel was Re: [Cal_Boats] FW: Cal 33 & 35 > > > I had a similar problem with my Cal 3-30. I took the old plastic panel to a local car customizer who built a stainless steel replacement panel using the old plastic panel as a pattern. Looks and works great. > > Nick Nick.Evans@... wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com > [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sailoeman2 > Sent: October 12, 2007 3:29 PM > To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: Cal 33 & 35 > > Hello, I am new to the Cal boats yahoo group. I oown a 1985 Cal 35 MK > II. In answer to questions it is a Lapworth design. In communicating > with others in another Cal group no longer functioning I was told > that my hull number indicated that my Cal 35 was the last 35 produced > by Cal Boats. I do know it was the last one produced in Florida > before Cal moved everything back to Fall River, Mass. I did not think > they ever produced the 35 again before going out of business, but I > saw a 1988 Cal 35 advertised in the Boat US magazine. > > Does anyone know where or if I can find a replacement engine panel > insert, not the engine panel itself, but the white plastic insert > that is atached to the cockpit fiberglass and the engine panel fits > into the insert? > > --- In Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com, r good my1972ih@ wrote: > > > > > > unless you are on the tall side, in which case go for the Cruising > Cal 35 with 6'6" headroom > > Reggie > > > > > > To: Cal_Boats@: imissedmyface@: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:36:11 - > 0700Subject: Re: [Cal_Boats] Cal 33 & 35 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Scott, > > > > When you refer to the `Cal 35', I assume you are referring to 80's > Mk I and II models (Lapworth, IORish) because they look somewhat like > the 33 (Hunt). > > > > In my opinion, the 33 is a much better performing boat with a more > modern design. It also is available in a 4.67' draft model which I > believe is what you need for the Chesapeake and other shallow bays on > the east coast. So that would be my choice if coastal cruising is a > priority. > > > > If offshore cruising is a priority, I'd lean towards a deep draft > boat unless the Bahamas' are a priority. For the cost of a 33 (which > are a bit more expensive than the 35), you might be getting into Cal > 39 territory and I really like them for offshore work. So I'd > recommend the jump to the 39 for offshore work. > > > > If for some reason the 35 is still on your list, get the Mk II. > > > > Dave > > 80 Cal 35 MkI, Runnin Late > > Coyote Pt, SF Bay > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----From: Scott Sauvageot > rxnumbercruncher@To: cal_boats@: Thursday, October 11, 2007 > 12:54:37 PMSubject: [Cal_Boats] Cal 33 & 35 > > > > Windows Live Hotmail and Microsoft Office Outlook - together at > last. Get it now! > > > > > > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's > updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------\ ------ > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. > Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. >

Instrument / control panels should be made of an insulating, not electrically conducting, material, according to ABYC recommendations. Joe DeMers Sound Marine Diesel LLC www.soundmarinediesel.com ----- Original Message ----- From: jr_rousseve To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 7:22 PM Subject: Replacement instrument panel was Re: [Cal_Boats] FW: Cal 33 & 35 Looking for a panel ? I can make you one in stainless steel ! I made one and you can see it on my web page . www.freedomfabrications.com Check out my photos page. Any thing for your boat in stainless steel , railing , davit , mount for windmill gen. Take a look JR --- In Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com, Sail Away <Svadas4@...> wrote: > > Try www.wewireboats.com > > He is a sailor who also owns a Cal and makes custom electrical panels for boats. Met him online through Cal group and met him in Annapolis a couple of years ago. Actually, he is going to give me a price on one over the winter as I am also in need of a new panel. > > Good Luck > Greg > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Preferred Customer > To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 11:54 AM > Subject: Replacement instrument panel was Re: [Cal_Boats] FW: Cal 33 & 35 > > > I had a similar problem with my Cal 3-30. I took the old plastic panel to a local car customizer who built a stainless steel replacement panel using the old plastic panel as a pattern. Looks and works great. > > Nick Nick.Evans@... wrote: > > ----Original Message----- > From: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com > [mailto:Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sailoeman2 > Sent: October 12, 2007 3:29 PM > To: Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: Cal 33 & 35 > > Hello, I am new to the Cal boats yahoo group. I oown a 1985 Cal 35 MK > II. In answer to questions it is a Lapworth design. In communicating > with others in another Cal group no longer functioning I was told > that my hull number indicated that my Cal 35 was the last 35 produced > by Cal Boats. I do know it was the last one produced in Florida > before Cal moved everything back to Fall River, Mass. I did not think > they ever produced the 35 again before going out of business, but I > saw a 1988 Cal 35 advertised in the Boat US magazine. > > Does anyone know where or if I can find a replacement engine panel > insert, not the engine panel itself, but the white plastc insert > that is atached to the cockpit fiberglass and the engine panel fits > into the insert? > > --- In Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com, r good my1972ih@ wrote: > > > > > > unless you are on the tall side, in which case go for the Cruising > Cal 35 with 6'6" headroom > > Reggie > > > > > > To: Cal_Boats@: imissedmyface@: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:36:11 - > 0700Subject: Re: [Cal_Boats] Cal 33 & 35 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Scott, > > > > When you refer to the `Cal 35', I assume you are referring to 80's > Mk I and II models (Lapworth, IORish) because they look somewhat like > the 33 (Hunt). > > > > In my opinion, the 33 is a much better performing boat with a more > modern design. It also is available in a 4.67' draft model which I > believe is what you need for the Chesapeak and other shallow bays on > the east coast. So that would be my choice if coastal cruising is a > priority. > > > > If offshore cruising is a priority, I'd lean towards a deep draft > boat unless the Bahamas' are a priority. For the cost of a 33 (which > are a bit more expensive than the 35), you might be getting into Cal > 39 territory and I really like them for offshore work. So I'd > recommend the jump to the 39 for offshore work. > > > > If for some reason the 35 is still on your list, get the Mk II. > > > > Dave > > 80 Cal 35 MkI, Runnin Late > > Coyote Pt, SF Bay > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----From: Scott Sauvageot > rxnumbercruncher@To: cal_boats@: Thursday, October 11, 2007 > 12:54:37 PMSubject: [Cal_Boats] Cal 33 & 35 > > > > Windows Live Hotmail and Microsoft Office Outlook - together at > last. Get it no! > > > > > > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's > updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. > Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.11/1071 - Release Date: 10/15/2007 6:48 AM

--- In Ca… [at] yahoogroups.com, "Joe DeMers" <jedsail@...> wrote: > > Instrument / control panels should be made of an insulating, not electrically conducting, material, according to ABYC recommendations. > > Joe DeMers > Sound Marine Diesel LLC > www.soundmarinediesel.com I wondered about that too. My panel is fiberglass and covered by a standard Beckson port light so it can be seald off from the cockpit. Mike Kennedy Conquest Cal 40 # 96