Re: Thank you, Chris! (Alfred!)

Marsh, that's all the more reason that he should remember to clip (and given his profession, he should understand signal to noise ratios). The unnamed was far from the worst offender yesterday, however. I found another message with a 0.7% signal to noise ratio. Talk about a rowboat of thought adrift on an ocean of words! Alfred Poor 1973 T34C #288, "Jambalaya" Original message: Yes, but that person's are the ones' I usually read first. Marsh Alfred Poor wrote: > > I won't single anyone out, but based on word count, the message just > before yours in the Digest this morning had a signal to noise ratio of > less than 5%.