4 messages2013-02-27 15:04 UTCthrough 2013-02-27 16:21 UTC
America's Cup conundrum
Alfred Poor2013-02-27 15:04 UTC
I read that there is no agreement among the teams about the use of
hydrofoils on the 72-foot cats that will race for the America's Cup. I find
this counter-intuitive; I'd think that foiling and getting the hulls out of
the water would reduce drag significantly and be much faster. Apparently
leeway is a factor, however, and perhaps the velocity made good (VMG)
towards the mark is better when you have the leeward hull to push against.
My boat only has one hull, and does not use a rigid wing for a sail. It's
likely worth less than half as much as a single winch on an AC72 and the
only way it could match the speed of those boats would be if you dropped it
from a crane, but I still find the science and boat design of the AC
competition to be fascinating. It pushes the boundary conditions of our
sport and reveals some breath-taking performance.
I think this is going to be great fun!
Alfred Poor
1973 Tartan 34C #288 "Jambalaya"
Re: [Cal_Boats] America's Cup conundrum
Allen Edwards2013-02-27 15:30 UTC
While I agree it is going to be great, I also enjoyed the Doytona-500 this
year and I think they are both have about the same degree of relevance to
my kind of sailing.
Allen
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Alfred Poor <ap… [at] verizon.net> wrote:
> **
>
>
> I read that there is no agreement among the teams about the use of
> hydrofoils on the 72-foot cats that will race for the America’s Cup. I find
> this counter-intuitive; I’d think that foiling and getting the hulls out of
> the water would reduce drag significantly and be much faster. Apparently
> leeway is a factor, however, and perhaps the velocity made good (VMG)
> towards the mark is better when you have the leeward hull to push against.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> My boat only has one hull, and does not use a rigid wing for a sail. It’s
> likely worth less than half as much as a single winch on an AC72 and the
> only way it could match the speed of those boats would be if you dropped it
> from a crane, but I still find the science and boat design of the AC
> competition to be fascinating. It pushes the boundary conditions of our
> sport and reveals some breath-taking performance.****
>
> ** **
>
> I think this is going to be great fun!****
>
> ** **
>
> Alfred Poor****
>
> 1973 Tartan 34C #288 “Jambalaya”****
>
> ** **
>
>
>
Re: [Cal_Boats] America's Cup conundrum
Adam Thorp2013-02-27 15:51 UTC
"Apparently leeway is a factor, however, and perhaps the velocity made good
(VMG) towards the mark is better when you have the leeward hull to push
against."
I would still think that you'd want to get the hull out of the water with
the hydrofoil and then combat leeway with a vertical fin below the
horizontal hydrofoil. Actually, I remember seeing a circular shaped
hydrofoil that keeps it's lift as the boat heels, and a *small *vertical
fin. I was surprised at how small it was. Did I see that picture on this
list? I'm sure a great deal of engineering also goes into building
stability into the system... A heeled cat, resting on a hydrofoil or two,
and at high speed. Oh my.. fun :)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Allen Edwards <al… [at] gmail.com>wrote:
> **
>
>
> While I agree it is going to be great, I also enjoyed the Doytona-500 this
> year and I think they are both have about the same degree of relevance to
> my kind of sailing.
>
> Allen
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Alfred Poor <ap… [at] verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> I read that there is no agreement among the teams about the use of
>> hydrofoils on the 72-foot cats that will race for the America’s Cup. I find
>> this counter-intuitive; I’d think that foiling and getting the hulls out of
>> the water would reduce drag significantly and be much faster. Apparently
>> leeway is a factor, however, and perhaps the velocity made good (VMG)
>> towards the mark is better when you have the leeward hull to push against.
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> My boat only has one hull, and does not use a rigid wing for a sail. It’s
>> likely worth less than half as much as a single winch on an AC72 and the
>> only way it could match the speed of those boats would be if you dropped it
>> from a crane, but I still find the science and boat design of the AC
>> competition to be fascinating. It pushes the boundary conditions of our
>> sport and reveals some breath-taking performance.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I think this is going to be great fun!****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Alfred Poor****
>>
>> 1973 Tartan 34C #288 “Jambalaya”****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [Cal_Boats] America's Cup conundrum
Chris Campbell2013-02-27 16:21 UTC
On 2/27/2013 10:04 AM, Alfred Poor wrote:
>
>
> I read that there is no agreement among the teams about the use of
> hydrofoils on the 72-foot cats that will race for the America's Cup. I
> find this counter-intuitive; I'd think that foiling and getting the
> hulls out of the water would reduce drag significantly and be much
> faster. Apparently leeway is a factor, however, and perhaps the
> velocity made good (VMG) towards the mark is better when you have the
> leeward hull to push against.
>
> My boat only has one hull, and does not use a rigid wing for a sail.
> It's likely worth less than half as much as a single winch on an AC72
> and the only way it could match the speed of those boats would be if
> you dropped it from a crane, but I still find the science and boat
> design of the AC competition to be fascinating. It pushes the boundary
> conditions of our sport and reveals some breath-taking performance.
>
I agree that it's beneficial to advance the science of boat design and
push boundaries, but it's important to establish parameters, too. One
limiting factor for real-world sailing has always been
seaworthiness--the ability of the vessel to survive in a reasonable
range of conditions. When the boats can only function in a very narrow
range of wind and seas, they become too purely theoretical to be
interesting. It seems to me that both science and sport would be well
served by a requirement that the boats be raced in whatever conditions
appear, within a reasonable range (there are some conditions that none
of us would head out in, by reason of good judgment and reasonable
concern for safety of crew). I want new boats to be fast, sexy, and
sophisticated but I don't want them to be delicate and dysfunctional.
As I recall, the original /America/ crossed the Atlantic on her own
bottom. Perhaps that's too much to ask for racing boats now, but at
least we should expect them to be seaworthy.
The schooner /Brilliant/, certainly the most aptly named boat, set a
record for yachts of her size on her initial voyage across the
Atlantic. Walter Barnum had the record, with departure and arrival
times, memorialized on a bronze plaque in her companionway. It wouldn't
be realistic to expect AC yachts to be sailing and in fine form 70 years
later, but we ought at least to expect that they will perform /as
sailboats/. One aspect of life as a sailboat is surviving the
anticipated environment.
Chris Campbell
>
>